MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Research Associates
    • Justin Beaumont
    • Roland Boer
    • Robert Bosco
    • Christopher Craig Brittain
    • Çağdaş Dedeoğlu
    • Timothy Fitzgerald
    • George Gonzalez
    • Warren S. Goldstein
    • Marsha Hewitt
    • Darlene Juschka
    • Rebekka King
    • George Lundskow
    • Seyed Javad Miri
    • Matthew Del Nevo
    • Kenneth MacKendrick
    • Craig Martin
    • Andrew McKinnon
    • Sarah M. Pike
    • Jean-Pierre Reed
    • Dana Sawchuk
    • Rudolf J. Siebert
    • Paul-François Tremlett
  • Journal
  • Book Series
  • Listserve
  • Blog
  • Meetings
  • Readings
    • The Left Hegelians
    • Marx and Engels
    • The Social Democrats
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Max Weber
    • Ernst Troeltsch
    • Sigmund Freud
    • The Frankfurt School
      • Walter Benjamin
      • Ernst Bloch
      • Theodor W. Adorno
      • Max Horkheimer
      • Erich Fromm
      • Leo Löwenthal
      • Jürgen Habermas
    • Post-Structuralism
      • Michel Foucault
      • Jacques Derrida
    • Critical Theory of Religion
    • Class Analysis of Religion
    • Critical Feminist Studies in Religion
    • Queer Studies and Religion
  • Links
    • Academic Associations
      • American Academy of Religion
      • Asociación de Cientistas Sociales de la Religión del Mercosur
      • Association for Critical Sociology
      • Association for the Sociology of Religion
      • The Critical Religion Association
      • Ernst Bloch Assoziation
      • International Society for the Sociology of Religion
      • International Walter Benjamin Society
      • North American Association for the Study of Religion
      • Radical Philosophy Association
      • Religious Research Association
      • Society for Biblical Literature
      • Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
    • Sections
      • AAA Society for the Anthropology of Religion
      • APA Society for the Psychology of Religion & Spirituality
      • BSA Sociology of Religion Study Group
      • ASA Section on Marxist Sociology
      • ISA RC22 Sociology of Religion
      • ASA Section on the Sociology of Religion
    • Journals
      • A-J
        • The Bible and Critical Theory
        • Comparative Islamic Studies
        • Constellations
        • Crisis and Critique
        • Critical Horizons
        • Culture and Religion
        • Historical Materialism
        • Implicit Religion
        • Islamic Perspective Journal
        • Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
        • Journal of the American Academy of Religion
        • Journal of Contemporary Religion
      • K-Z
        • Method and Theory in the Study of Religion
        • Middle East Studies Online Journal
        • New German Critique
        • Philosophy and Social Criticism
        • Religion Compass
        • Review of Religious Research
        • Social Compass
        • Sociology of Religion
        • Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses
        • Telos
        • Thesis Eleven
        • Theory, Culture & Society
    • Book Series
      • Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture
      • Studies in Critical Research on Religion
      • Studies in Religion and Critical Thought
    • Foundations and Trusts
      • Pew Religion and Public Life
      • Lilly Endowment - Religion
      • John Templeton Foundation
    • Research Institutes and Centers
      • Center for Religions and Institutions in Post-Secular Society
      • Erich Fromm Institut Tübingen
      • Critical Religion Research Group
      • Ernst Bloch Zentrum
      • Institut für Sozialforschung
      • Institute for Critical Theory
    • Graduate Programs
      • Global Center for Advanced Studies
      • History and Critical Theories of Religion - Vanderbilt University
      • Critical Religion - University of Sterling
    • Archives
      • Adorno Archiv
      • Max Horkheimer Archive
      • Nachlass Leo Löwenthal
    • Websites
      • Critical Theory of Religion and Society
      • E-International Relations
      • Herbert Marcuse Homepage
      • Marxismo Critico
      • Marxist Internet Archive
      • Mute
      • Public Theology
      • Radicalisation Research
      • Sociology of Religion Resources
      • Walter Benjamin Research Syndicate
    • Blogs
      • Being and Lime (Chris Brittain)
      • Failed Messiah
      • Stalin's Moustache (Roland Boer)
      • The Religion Factor
    • Museums
      • Wilhelm Reich Museum
    • Newsletters
      • Religion Watch
  • Contact
The Center for Critical Research on ReligionThe Center for Critical Research on Religion


"the premise of all criticism"

www.criticaltheoryofreligion.org
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Research Associates
    • Justin Beaumont
    • Roland Boer
    • Robert Bosco
    • Christopher Craig Brittain
    • Çağdaş Dedeoğlu
    • Timothy Fitzgerald
    • George Gonzalez
    • Warren S. Goldstein
    • Marsha Hewitt
    • Darlene Juschka
    • Rebekka King
    • George Lundskow
    • Seyed Javad Miri
    • Matthew Del Nevo
    • Kenneth MacKendrick
    • Craig Martin
    • Andrew McKinnon
    • Sarah M. Pike
    • Jean-Pierre Reed
    • Dana Sawchuk
    • Rudolf J. Siebert
    • Paul-François Tremlett
  • Journal
  • Book Series
  • Listserve
  • Blog
  • Meetings
  • Readings
    • The Left Hegelians
    • Marx and Engels
    • The Social Democrats
    • Friedrich Nietzsche
    • Max Weber
    • Ernst Troeltsch
    • Sigmund Freud
    • The Frankfurt School
      • Walter Benjamin
      • Ernst Bloch
      • Theodor W. Adorno
      • Max Horkheimer
      • Erich Fromm
      • Leo Löwenthal
      • Jürgen Habermas
    • Post-Structuralism
      • Michel Foucault
      • Jacques Derrida
    • Critical Theory of Religion
    • Class Analysis of Religion
    • Critical Feminist Studies in Religion
    • Queer Studies and Religion
  • Links
    • Academic Associations
      • American Academy of Religion
      • Asociación de Cientistas Sociales de la Religión del Mercosur
      • Association for Critical Sociology
      • Association for the Sociology of Religion
      • The Critical Religion Association
      • Ernst Bloch Assoziation
      • International Society for the Sociology of Religion
      • International Walter Benjamin Society
      • North American Association for the Study of Religion
      • Radical Philosophy Association
      • Religious Research Association
      • Society for Biblical Literature
      • Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
    • Sections
      • AAA Society for the Anthropology of Religion
      • APA Society for the Psychology of Religion & Spirituality
      • BSA Sociology of Religion Study Group
      • ASA Section on Marxist Sociology
      • ISA RC22 Sociology of Religion
      • ASA Section on the Sociology of Religion
    • Journals
      • A-J
        • The Bible and Critical Theory
        • Comparative Islamic Studies
        • Constellations
        • Crisis and Critique
        • Critical Horizons
        • Culture and Religion
        • Historical Materialism
        • Implicit Religion
        • Islamic Perspective Journal
        • Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
        • Journal of the American Academy of Religion
        • Journal of Contemporary Religion
      • K-Z
        • Method and Theory in the Study of Religion
        • Middle East Studies Online Journal
        • New German Critique
        • Philosophy and Social Criticism
        • Religion Compass
        • Review of Religious Research
        • Social Compass
        • Sociology of Religion
        • Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses
        • Telos
        • Thesis Eleven
        • Theory, Culture & Society
    • Book Series
      • Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture
      • Studies in Critical Research on Religion
      • Studies in Religion and Critical Thought
    • Foundations and Trusts
      • Pew Religion and Public Life
      • Lilly Endowment - Religion
      • John Templeton Foundation
    • Research Institutes and Centers
      • Center for Religions and Institutions in Post-Secular Society
      • Erich Fromm Institut Tübingen
      • Critical Religion Research Group
      • Ernst Bloch Zentrum
      • Institut für Sozialforschung
      • Institute for Critical Theory
    • Graduate Programs
      • Global Center for Advanced Studies
      • History and Critical Theories of Religion - Vanderbilt University
      • Critical Religion - University of Sterling
    • Archives
      • Adorno Archiv
      • Max Horkheimer Archive
      • Nachlass Leo Löwenthal
    • Websites
      • Critical Theory of Religion and Society
      • E-International Relations
      • Herbert Marcuse Homepage
      • Marxismo Critico
      • Marxist Internet Archive
      • Mute
      • Public Theology
      • Radicalisation Research
      • Sociology of Religion Resources
      • Walter Benjamin Research Syndicate
    • Blogs
      • Being and Lime (Chris Brittain)
      • Failed Messiah
      • Stalin's Moustache (Roland Boer)
      • The Religion Factor
    • Museums
      • Wilhelm Reich Museum
    • Newsletters
      • Religion Watch
  • Contact

V. B. Meyer-Rochow*, “What to Enter into the Box Marked ‘Religion’?”

November 15, 2017 Posted by admin Posts and Discussion

I am certain this has happened to many of our readers too, and often I’m at a loss how to respond to it. It’s that little rectangular box marked “Religion” that requests you to fill in your reply. In some cases, the form that contains this question already contains a list of the major (or let’s call them “established”) religions plus perhaps the option “none” or “other”. The respondent then simply needs to tick only the one most suitable term on the list. Perhaps this is not so much of a problem for those who consider themselves adherents, members, or followers of some of the “established” religions that are on the list. However, even they may struggle when they wish to specify which ‘branch’ or ‘stream’ of their religion they belong to, but have no way to do so – at least not when these forms are on the web and only allow one to choose just one of the options given in the dropdown. And what about the options of “none” or “other”? The term “none” is ambiguous as I will explain below and “other” can be unsatisfactory if not outright upsetting to someone, who regards his or her unlisted religion as important and on a par with the established religions.

Even though it may seem easier to handle question boxes on forms that you fill in by hand, the one asking about your religion can still pose problems. Usually the box is quite small (which could be one difficulty), but the far more serious problem concerns what is actually acceptable as a “religion” (cf., Smith 1963; Martin 2002) There are hundreds of religions in the world; would it be acceptable to enter the name (if there is actually one) for a tribal religion followed by a small number of people? I have worked a lot in Arunachal Pradesh (Meyer-Rochow et al. 2015) and there are many people who would want to enter their religion as Donyi-Polo (Chaudhuri 2013). But would that be acceptable? Or more problematic still: what if someone has a religion of her/his own? I know someone, call him a Nature-Believer or “modern-day-animist”, who says he has his own personal religion which, for instance, allows him to eat only organisms that he has killed with his own hands. Since as a young man he did on a few occasions kill chickens, and since he loves going fishing, he allows himself to consume poultry and fish, but never any mammals, because he never killed any. Would it be acceptable to write into the religion box “own” or “personal religion”?

And how about those that claim they are atheists or agnostics? Explicit atheists, sometimes also termed positive or hard atheists, reject all suggestions of the existence of deities; for them gods simply do not exist and never have existed (Smith 1974; Martin 2002). Disputed by many that this form of atheism could qualify as a kind of religion (e.g., Flew 1997), because it does not possess the characteristics of a religion, namely the belief in some deity or deities, the question arises whether it would then be proper at all to answer the question about the “religion” with the word “atheist”. If atheism is not a religion, would it be more appropriate to enter into the box “none”? With agnosticism it becomes even more complicated as agnostics, depending to whom you speak, claim that we can never know whether there are or aren’t deities and that therefore they do not believe in any of the established religions (Rowe 1998).

Leaving the box blank or entering the word “none” seem like attractive alternative possibilities and a way out of the dilemma, although leaving it blank will usually not allow you to move on to the next page, at least not if you deal with Internet forms. Moreover, leaving the field blank could mean that just like a newborn or young child that has never been confronted with the question of deities, the supernatural, or religions, you are an ignoramus. It would seem that you have either never had a chance to think about religions and arrive at a conscious conclusion for yourself or that you are too stupid to understand the question or contemplate the differences between religions. In fact, one could debate whether in this time and age a question as personal as that about one’s religion is actually still acceptable in questionnaires at all – other than for statistical analyses. Is it not similar to people being asked about their sexual orientation, their food preferences or whether they like beaches more than mountains or vice versa?

Cited Literature

Flew, A. (1997). The presumption of atheism. In P. L. Quinn & C. Talliaferro (Eds.), A companion to philosophy of religion (pp. 410-416). Oxford: Blackwell.

Rowe, W. L. (1998). “Agnosticism”. In: E. Craig, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis. Abingdon, UK ISBN 978-0-415-07310-3.

Chaudhuri, S.K. (2013) The institutionalization of tribal religion, recasting the donyi-polo movement in Arunachal Pradesh. Asian Ethnology 72: 259-277

Meyer-Rochow, V.B., Megu, K. and Chakravorty, J. ( 2015) Rats: if you can’t beat them eat them ! (Tricks of the trade observed among the Adi and other North-East Indian tribals). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:45, DOI 10.1186/s13002-015-0034-2

Smith, G.H. (1989) Atheism: the case against God. Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York, ISBN 0-87975-124-X

Smith, W.C. (1963) The meaning and end of religion. Macmillan, New York. Martin, M. (2002) Atheism, morality and meaning. Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York, ISBN 978-0820-434629

 

*Research Institute of Luminous Organisms, Hachijo, 2749 Nakanogo (Hachijojima), Tokyo 100-1623, Japan and Department of Genetics and Physiology, Oulu University, Oulu, FIN 90140, Finland

e-mail: meyrow@gmail.com

Share
0
Center for Critical Research on Religion

Center for Critical Research on Religion

This content isn't available right now ... See MoreSee Less

This content isn't available right now

When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.
5 days ago
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Load more
Tweets by @@critresrel

Tag Cloud

Adorno Buddhism Christianity climate change Colonialism Communism critical religion critical sociology of religion critical theory critical theory of religion critique Donald Trump Editorials Education Emile Durkheim Ernst Bloch Evangelicalism Feminism Foucault Frankfurt School gender Habermas Hope indigenous people Iran Islam Islamic Reformers Latin America liberalism light Marxism Messianism Mormonism Occupy Movement Pastoral Power political theology politics postcolonialsm postsecularism psychoanalysis Race Racism and Religion Responses Roman Catholic Church Secularism sociology of religion Terrorism The Muslim Question theology Timothy Fitzgerald

Categories

  • Critical Research on Religion
  • CRR Editorials
  • CRR Volume 1, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 1, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 1, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 10, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 10, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 10, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 2, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 2, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 2, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 3, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 3, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 3, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 4, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 4, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 4, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 5, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 5, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 5, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 6, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 6, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 6, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 7, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 7, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 7, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 8, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 8, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 8, Issue 3
  • CRR Volume 9, Issue 1
  • CRR Volume 9, Issue 2
  • CRR Volume 9, Issue 3
  • News
  • Posts and Discussion
  • Responses to CRR Editorials
  • Roundtables
  • Timothy Fitzgerald
  • Uncategorized
  • Zoom Session

Archives

  • January 2023
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • August 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • August 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • December 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • March 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • October 2010
  • May 2010
  • September 2008

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Prev Next