Kevin Schilbrack, “A metaphysics for the study of religion: A critical reading of Russell McCutcheon”
Mitsutoshi Horii, “Historicizing the category of ‘religion’ in sociological theories: Max Weber and Emile Durkheim
Kenneth MacKendrick, “Does past religion have a past? Habermas, religion, and the sacred complex”
Timothy Fitzgerald, “Joel Harrison on Facts and Values, Critical Religion and on Bruno Latour”
I recently (22 Nov 2017) found the text for Joel Harrison’s podcast “Facts v. Values: Can Religious Studies Be More Critical?”[i] when I wandered onto Facebook. I think my cursor inadvertently hovered over a small region of e-territory and the article jumped out at me.
I was glad I saw the text and would like to contribute some discussion. Harrison’s piece is a defence of an editorial written by Warren Goldstein, Rebekka King and Jonathan Boyarin published in Critical Research on Religion (April 2016). This defence is turned against ‘critical religion’. I already responded to the CRR editorial several months ago, and I don’t know whether or not Harrison or Lucas Scott Wright has seen that (see CRR, vol. 4, 3: pp. 307-313, 2016).
Harrison’s article is also a discussion and advocacy of an essay by Bruno Latour, “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” [Critical Inquiry 30, no. 2 (Winter 2004): 225-248. [https://doi.org/10.1086/421123]. Harrison thinks that ‘critical religion’ has valuable things to learn from Bruno Latour, and I think he is probably right. But I need to be clear what is being suggested. (more…)
Timothy Fitzgerald, “Critical religion and critical research on religion: A response to the April 2016 editorial”
Steven Engler, “Why be critical? Introducing a symposium on Capitalizing Religion”
The debate over the CRR Editorials continues…
Steven Engler, Review Symposium on Craig Martin’s Capitalizing Religion (2014)
Why be critical? Introducing a symposium on Capitalizing Religion
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0048721X.2016.1192831
Harrison and Wright, “Facts vs. Values: Can Religious Studies Be More Critical?”
Joel Harrison and Lucas Scott Wright
discuss April 2016 CRR Editorial
“Critical Theory of Religion vs. Critical Religion”
in a podcast:
Stacie Swain, “What’s in a name, a name rearranged?”
Stacie Swain on CRR Editorials:
http://practicumreligionblog.blogspot.ca/2016/04/whats-in-name-name-rearranged-part-1.html
Goldstein, King, and Boyarin, “Critical Theory of Religion vs. Critical Religion”
Like us on Facebook!
This content isn't available right now
When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.
“We are not, in fact, afraid of all these socialists, anarchists,
atheists, and revolutionaries. We keep an eye on them, and their movements are known to us. But there are some special people among them, although not many: these are believers in God and Christians, and at the same time socialists.They are the ones we are most afraid of; they are terrible people! A socialist Christian is more dangerous than a socialist atheist.”
-Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
